Welcome NSWG/MSSC reviewers! Here is a list of the schedule of the review and associated sections.
- Red Team – JSC, GSFC, SSC, SA+IV&V
- Blue Team – MSFC, KSC, ARC, SA+IV&V
- Green Team – JPL, GRC, LaRC, DFRC, SA+IV&V
Click on BOOK A tab above to see full schedule with list of items for each review team.
This site is under development. You can follow the navigation above to explore the site. If you have any questions, please contact Jon Verville at 301-286-8741.
We are glad you have come to the NASA Software Engineering Handbook site. The purpose of this site is to provide key insights to you, a Software Engineering professional. We plan on two phases of release: the first up to 30% material complete in February 2011, and 80% material complete in October 2011.
To view a presentation that was given on the handbook development to the Software Engineering Working Group in August 2010, [click here|^7150handbook-swgf2f-_jonv_REV-C.ppt].
The Software Engineering handbook will have two components. A PDF/printable version for those who wish to use the material in a more traditional way. We are also developing this website as an interactive and dynamic version of the same material. We plan on utilizing web technologies, such as tagging (folksonomies), social commenting, and web editability and versioning to enhance the experience of what a handbook for print provides.
Already, we are accepting comments at the very bottom of this page. You may leave an anonymous comment, but please use responsibly and according to the [Code of Conduct].
There are a total of 37 special topics which will be chapters within the handbook. You can click on the third tab (features and topics) above to view what topics exist so far in the handbook. A partial list is as follows:
The NASA Software Engineering standards are laid out in the NPR 7150.2 document (click here to view it on the web). Within the document, there are requirements numbering up to 140. You can click the second tab (requirements guidance) above to view what guidance exists so far in the handbook. We will be producing material for each of these requirements in the following areas: Guidance, Rationale, Tools Available, Links, Guidance for Small Projects, and Lessons Learned.
Welcome from your handbook team! ?Click for more info...
We are (left to right): Dan Gauntner, Jon Verville, Lee Jackson,
Tommy Tayman, Kathy Malnick, and Kevin Carmichael (Lead)
Not pictured: Dave York
Picture taken in front of the new A-3 Test Stand at SSC
The NASA Software Electronic Handbook (EHB) originated from multiple requests for additional guidance, rationale, resources, references and lessons learned for acquiring, managing, developing, assuring and maintaining NASA software systems. The decision to use an electronic,
<ac:macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup"> ]]></ac:plain-text-body>
- to publish material in a timely fashion
- to provide needed information in concise screen-friendly chunks
- to simplify updates to the handbook
- to make it easily searchable
- to engage the NASA software community by providing an easy-to-use vehicle for
- providing feedback
- sharing examples of best practices
- contributing lessons learned developed on their own projects
The EHB is accessible on the NASA Engineering Network. The Agency's software community will find they have complete and speedy access to all written content and reference links in the handbook. An important set of links are provided to relevant processes, templates, and tools in the NASA Process Asset Library (PAL).
The EHB wiki can be used in a similar manner to hardcopy guidebooks, but offers distinct advantages for the reader. Once a general familiarity with the resource is obtained (typically a quick scan and flip through a Table of Contents, Chapter organization, and included Reference/Appendix material), the user will be able to directly access concise information relevant to their interest or need.
Users are encouraged to provide general feedback on the EHB by using the comments box found on the wiki pages. Suggestions for improvements, identification of errors, and proposed additions to the EHB are all welcome. The EHB development team will review and disposition comments received. Additions, if approved for posting by the EHB editor, will be added via incremental updates.
The EHB is organized in a series of cross-linked Books and Appendices. The basic information is presented within these Books in the form of essays providing guidance on the implementation of each software engineering requirement (SWE) and essays in the form of Topics, which are more expansive on particular ideas and contain additional instructions for developing and acquiring software. Book A essays include listings and references to software development tools used around the Agency, the full 7150.2 requirements list where you can view the complete text of the NPR 7150.2 requirements with links to each section in the handbook, a small projects Guidance compilation, and lists of terms used in the EHB.
The EHB provides guidance associated with each SWE-xxx requirement. Software developers should note that the information provided in these modules are general approaches for Agency use. They should consult their NASA Center resources for local procedures and guidance when available.
Within the EHB, Book A is an online introduction to the wiki itself. Book B contains the developed guidance for each SWE. (Note that the SWE descriptions are organized in six Chapters that mirror the organization of NPR 7150.2). The SWE are presented in nominal ascending numerical order, with some higher numbered SWE intermixed. These latter SWE represent the changes made between the NPR 7150.2 and the NPR 7150.2A revisions.
The EHB was written so each SWE guidance section provides a stand alone information chunk. To enhance the usefulness of each module, the guidance include hyperlinks for easy reference to related SWEs and Topics. Book C contains special Topic discussions that are broader than any single SWE. Many of the special Topics take the form of 'how to' and instructional material for users seeking to improve their knowledge and practices in software engineering. It is expected that special Topics will help the user go beyond the minimum descriptions presented in each SWE. Many Topic numbers are reserved at this time for future use.
To further assist the user in finding needed and useful information, a 'tag" system has been developed using the SMARTS Tagging approach to indicate relationships between or among individual ideas contained within multiple SWEs. Book D lists the current tags and labels that are used throughout the handbook. A tagging search feature in Book D allows both individual and multiple tag searching. Tagging searches provide an additional way for users to browse and discover content within the handbook. The terms 'tag' and 'label' are used interchangeably in the handbook.
In the EHB a typical SWE essay has six sections;
- THE REQUIREMENT: This section is a restatement of the NPR 7150.2 requirement wording, including any Notes from either the requirement paragraph itself, or any applicable note from Appendix D. This section also gives a tabular representation of the applicability to each software class.
The text in this section can only be altered via an approved change request and NODIS update of NPR 7150.2.
- RATIONALE: This section provides useful information regarding the purpose of the requirement. Occasionally, historical information and or references are included to further support the rationale statement.
- GUIDANCE: This section provides information helpful for interpreting the requirement, its scope, its relationship to other SWE, associated best practices, and references to supporting materials (standards, guides, published technical papers, the NASA Engineering Network and the NASA Process Asset Library (PAL) materials).
- SMALL PROJECTS: This section suggests implementation aids to small projects to help satisfy the SWE while accommodating the typically limited resources of time, funds, and personnel. The definition of 'small project' needs to be determined by the user. this determination does not relieve a project from satisfying the requirements in the NPR.
- RESOURCES: This section provides a listing of referenced and footnoted texts, documents in NASA repositories and out on the web, and other useful documents (e.g., checklists or templates). It is instructive to note that the handbook authors also included in the Resources sections listings of what might be best described as 'additional reading', i.e., useful items not specifically cited or linked to in the GUIDANCE section, but thought by the authors to contain educational or expanded discussions of the ideas covered in the SWE write-up.
Also within this section is usually a separate table listing of tools, items that will help the user satisfy the requirement (e.g., developer tools). The handbook wiki links SWEs and tools through the use of a master Tools table. The Tools table provides web sites for accessing the tool. It also lists Center(s) that currently use the tool in case the reader wants to seek out the 'experiences' of a current user of the tool. Readers are invited to submit their tools for candidate inclusion in the Tools table for the benefit of others around the Agency.
- LESSONS LEARNED (LL): This section contains references to the experiences of others involved in NASA software development activities as well as other industry and government development efforts. The majority are catalogued in the Public Lessons Learned library at the Office of the Chief Engineer (OCE). Some are derived from specialized project or Center collections as well as reputable industry and government groups. Occasionally a lesson has only indirect applicability to the requirement. It is presented as a related lesson that can be applied to help understand the content of the EHB.
Remember that the NPR 7150.2 is a requirements document. It uses 'shall' exclusively to indicate requirements. Applicability of a NPR 7150.2 requirement is determined by NASA Software Classification and the matrix in Appendix D (of the NPR). The EHB is not a requirements document, only an informational document. NO new requirements are added by the EHB. The authors strove to exclude the use of 'shall' and 'should' in any paragraph that might be interpreted as a requirement or even an augmentation to a requirement.
The NPR 7150.2 made extensive use of the NPR's Notes sections to help with the interpretation of the SWE. This handbook is intended to collaborate with and to augment the NPR's Notes.
The Requirements Mapping Matrix (RMM) (Appendix D, NPR 7150.2) provides a list of the applicability of each requirement by the Class of software being developed. Associated with many of the entries in the RMM are one or more notes that modify the applicability of the requirement for a particular Class. Since the EHB makes explicit mention of these modifiers in section 1 of the essay, an additional explanation for each note is included here.
The "X" notation signifies that the full requirement (assuming no 'exceptions') is applicable to the software. Note that requirements labeled with an "X" can still be tailored with the appropriate approvals, or otherwise affected by approved deviations and or waivers. The "SO" (i.e., Safety Only) designation signifies that the requirement for the classification of software needs only satisfy the safety aspects of the requirement. This may require the use of checklists (e.g., use of the 'litmus test') in NASA STD 8739.8 Software Assurance Standard and NASA STD 8719.13 Software Safety Standard to determine specifically what parts of the project, its software, and therefore the requirement, are applicable to ensure the development of safe software. The "P (Center)" designation, while amply described in [SWE-140], is used separately or in combination with the "SO" modifier. The "P (Center)" modifier is only applicable to the items of the requirement that do not incur a 'safety-critical' designation. The interpretation is consciously left to the individual Center Technical Authorities since they and their individual projects are unique, and this tends to make one universal applicable statement too inexact.
Some general comments:
- Note that the SWE titles in the EHB may not always agree with those in the NPR. The writing team expanded the titles for some of the SWE to help distinguish between other similarly sounding names (e.g., Bidirectional traceability).
- The EHB uses a
- While attempts were made to cite publically available (i.e., 'free') references, there may be an occasional reference that suggests the reader 'buy' a copy. If you come across one of these, try to access it through the NASA START (technical standards) site. A simple and quick registration is required. This NASA site provides prepaid access to many external repositories through an Agency wide agreement with the site.
- Much of the referenced material listed in the Resources section is located on the NASA Headquarters NODIS site (e.g., NPR's, NPD's), in the Agency PAL (Process Asset Library; e.g., materials from the OCE, Public Lessons learned), or in the NASA Technical Standards repository (START); e.g., NASA standards, IEEE standards, etc.).
- Extensive citations are also made to external sites (e.g., Hill AFB at STSC, Software Engineering Institute-SEI), and to general web-hosted sites (Caveat: since the web is a dynamic place, some references in the Resources section of the SWE may be discontinued online or moved to another host by their owners).
Each page of the EHB has a 'Comments' box to allow feedback and proposed inputs, revisions, and updates to the EHB. The EHB Development Team requests comments on errors, inputs on real or perceived conflicts among the essays within the EHB and suggestions for additional material such as best-in-class examples, templates, tools or lessons learned topics.